Share Your Thoughts on our Terminology Server! Let us know your insights and help enhance our services. The survey is open from Nov 19 to Dec 3, 2024. Your feedback matters! Learn More >

Share this page:

file Question re: BC GSSO standard from Nov 28 SGWG meeting

  • Posts: 51
11 months 3 weeks ago #8847 by Kelly Davison
Hi Karen,
Thanks for the question. I think this question is referring to the Health Services Sex or Gender Marker in the BC Standard. This data element is intended to accommodate legacy systems with only one data field. Here is what the standard says: "Health Services Sex or Gender Marker (HSSGM) refers to the documented gender or sex of an individual used for clinical, official, or legal purposes where only one data field for sex and gender is available, and where it is the value found in the local system and/or historical documentation. This data element may also be called “Administrative Gender or Sex,” “Legal Gender or Sex,” “Recorded Gender or Sex,” “Documented Gender or Sex.”"

The following guidance, which emphasizes the importance of provenance, is provided: "For incoming data, provenance of the data including source jurisdiction or organization, purpose (e.g., birth certificate, passport, BC services card), and validity period is extremely important for interpreting the content of the data. The local system is just one source of potentially many, each of which represents the actual value found official or legal documents. The codes for HSSGM should be restricted to the markers presented in Table 7.2.2.1 (M, F, X and U). The X marker can be used by people who do not identify as solely male or female. The U marker can be used by people who do not want a specific gender marker to be visible on their identification. If HSSGM is not required in the local system, default to collecting Gender Identity."

Many jurisdictions will have systems like this that will need to be reimagined to be inclusive - something that we are actively working on in BC. The HSSGM is an interim measure to accommodate current systems on their way to necessary transformations in their architecture for a standards based approach.

Kelly

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 36
11 months 3 weeks ago #8844 by Karen Courtney
Hi -

This question came up during our session today -

"One concern is how the BC standard still mixes sex and gender on one column...and the standards need to speak on how to 'split this content'."

This is likely referring to Recorded Sex/Gender

Kelly - can you elaborate on this?

Thanks,
Karen

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

InfoCentral logo

Improving the quality of patient care through the effective sharing of clinical information among health care organizations, clinicians and their patients.