Share this page:

file CA Baseline Profiles - Profiling Updates - Fri Aug 11th 2-3pm EST Agenda

  • Posts: 9
8 months 3 weeks ago #8622 by Lorraine Constable
Sheridan,

Agree, the bigger picture items are scheduled for the 18th. This is more of a specific technical question, and I have entered the issue here. Will definitely keep it to less than 15 minutes. We have some deadlines around implementing NamingSystems for new implementations into the fall, hence the urgency of the question.

Lorraine.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 61
8 months 3 weeks ago #8621 by Sheridan Cook
I had logged the discussion around whether we include guidance about our use of the Canadian URI Registry as an item on the governance agenda for 8/18 (following the review of interoperability governance content) since it came up related to guide content creation - but Lorraine if you think we could get an answer more easily through the technical lens we could bump it into today's agenda - please add a ticket to the issue log with context and indicating what you'd like the note to say.

Just a reminder that we did say we'd keep it to 15 minutes to see if we could come to a resolution about whether the guidance discussed was in the scope of the CA Baseline.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 19
8 months 3 weeks ago #8620 by Mukesh Kashyap
Hi Michael,

I will appreciate if you could please include the agenda item Lorraine Constable requested to include for August 11, 2023 CA FHIR WG meeting,

Thanks

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 9
8 months 3 weeks ago #8619 by Lorraine Constable
Hi Micheal, can we also add a quick question regarding the simplifier status settings in the URI registry, or so that be left to a different call?

Thanks,
Lorraine

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 430
8 months 3 weeks ago #8617 by Michael Savage
Hi all!

The agenda for tomorrow's CA Baseline Profiles Updates call is as follows:

1. Revisiting extensions that were based on R5 but are now housed in an iGuide that is version-independent (e.g. gender harmony); want to make a decision on whether we'll consider extensions that we previously did not include, on the basis of them being version-specific
2. Returning to analysis of Immunization and how we would apply obligations, and discussion on the stance the Baseline should take toward consumer obligations

Thank you!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

InfoCentral logo

Improving the quality of patient care through the effective sharing of clinical information among health care organizations, clinicians and their patients.