AB Proposed Changes to HL7 Message Specifications

Hi Andrew,

I believe you received this error since your access to InfoRMS requires to be granted. In order to grant your access to InfoRMS, please log into: infocentral.infoway-inforoute.ca/, hover over your username on the top right and select "my preferences". Under Question 4, you need to enter "InfoRMS" and then click Submit.

Sign up for InfoRMS

I've included an screen shot what the access request page looks like.

Please try it out and let me know if you run into issues. You can also contact This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. for support.

Thanks
Wendy

Hi Wendy, I get a permission error when trying to view these items. Do you know how I can view the above articles?

Please note the RFCs will be included in the next release of the identified artifacts. They have been added to InfoRMS (Infoway Request Management System):

informs.infoway-inforoute.ca/browse/HL-5343
informs.infoway-inforoute.ca/browse/HL-5345
informs.infoway-inforoute.ca/browse/HL-5347
informs.infoway-inforoute.ca/browse/HL-5348
informs.infoway-inforoute.ca/browse/HL-5349
informs.infoway-inforoute.ca/browse/HL-5350
informs.infoway-inforoute.ca/browse/HL-5351

Best regards,
Wendy Huang

Hello All,

I have added an extra column to define which changes are pre-adopted and which one are not, as per our last meeting action item. Please view it and let me know if you have any quesitons.

AB Proposed Changes to HL7 Message Specifications

Apologies for the delay. Here is the updated spreadsheet of changes indicating what the old values were as requested along with the powerpoint presentation.

AB requested changes spreadsheet

AB powerpoint presentation of requested changes

Hello,
We had comments on the format of this spreadsheet that we hope you can incorporate.

For the Summary. column, it would be nice to know what the item currently is (before the suggested change). As a reviewer, we need to spend time tracking down the item in question to first see what it was before to determine what the change is, then look at the rationale, then determine if there are any issues. It would be nicer to be able to take a quick glance and dig deeper if there are concerns.

Also, we feel like you may want to expand on the Description/Rationale column. In many cases, you state that you want to be more consistent, but do not give any further rationale. Being consistent is good, but sometimes that is not a good enough reason to warrant a change?