Canadian FHIR Baseline Profiles - Due Diligence Review - IPS – July 30th, 2-3pm EST

Attendees:

Michael Savage
Sheridan Cook
Elliot Silver
Maria Hu
Rita Pyle
Adesh Maharaj
Fariba Behzadi
Harsh Sharma
Inderpal Singh
Ken Sinn
Randy Nonay
Shamil Nizamov
Thomas Zhou

DiagnosticReport

• .category
o Motion to keep the LabResult-specific slice

• .code
o Same as above

• .group
o Decision on whether or not to re-include Group as a pointer for this one
o Decision is to re-include the Group pointer

• .encounter
o Will remove the MS flag; recognizing it’s important in certain use cases, can add a note which describes the rationale for inclusion in specific use cases

• .resultsinterpreter and .performer
o Decision to re-introduce CareTeam Profile as a pointer

• .specimen
o Decision to relax MS flag in CA Baseline

DiagnosticReport for Report and Note Exchange

• .category
o Value set’s URL gives a 404 error
o Proposal is to just revert the binding to the example value set from base r4

• .code
o Same as above

• .subject
o Same decision as with main DR Profile

• .encounter
o Same as with main DR Profile

• .performer
o Same as with main DR Profile

Remaining elements to be looked at next time

Hi all!

For the Friday July 30th CA Baseline <> IPS due diligence review session, our high-level agenda is as follows:

1. DiagnosticReport - review the discrepancies identified last session & decide if there's benefit in reviewing them again (versus leaving them as-is) (please see the relevant forum post for the

2. Decide on which further IPS profiles to review, or if we have reached a sufficient point of review of this iGuide

Thank you!