Canadian FHIR Baseline Profiles - Governance Stream Meeting - July 24th, 2-3pm EST

Attendees

Michael Savage
Rita Pyle
Sheridan Cook
Derek Ritz
Harsh Sharma
Kenneth Sinn
Kristina Garrels
Mukesh Kashyap
Randy Nonay
Scott Prior
Shamil Nizamov

• Sheridan and Mike recapped the 1st internal Due Diligence Review session from last Friday
• Suggestion is to have a means to prep in advance by isolating the profiles / elements the CA Baseline and the candidate iGuide have in common
• Suggestion to pursue using a tool / software to automate this comparison / highlighting process
• Especially because net-new iGuides would want to do a differential between their profiles and the CA Baseline profiles to easily view any differences and assess accordingly
• ACTION ITEM: send out a post to zulip & infocentral asking if there are tools which can ghihglihgt the differential between CA Baseline and another FHIR Implementation Guide
o Sheridan will post to Zulip, Mike to InfoCentral
• What processes / sets of tools can we re-use for the external due diligence review?
• Will be good to leverage the larger InfoCentral Community, as it reaches across lots of domains and jurisdictions
• ACTION ITEM: Review response from Infoway Standards Governance Project
• Will be good to eventually circulate the CA Baseline profiles with the TechNation (formerly ITAC) group

Hi all,

For the upcoming Canadian Baseline Governance Call on Friday July 24th, 2-3pm EST (reminder: see FHIR Solution Architecture in the InfoCentral calendar events, along with registration instructions), our agenda is the following:

1. Report-in on first internal Due Diligence Review session (July 17th), comparing CA Baseline to Ontario's Provincial Provider Registry FHIR Guide: experiences & steps moving forward

2. Discussion on tools, processes, frameworks that can/should be used for gathering and actioning feedback in subsequent external Due Diligence Review: what existing means can be re-used? what would any other pan-Canadian standards project use?

Thank you!