Share Your Thoughts on our Terminology Server! Let us know your insights and help enhance our services. The survey is open from Nov 19 to Dec 3, 2024. Your feedback matters! Learn More >

Share this page:

file Canadian FHIR Baseline Profiles - Governance Stream Meeting - January 24th, 2-3pm EST

  • Posts: 453
4 years 9 months ago #5651 by Michael Savage
Attendees

Michael Savage
Igor Sirkovich
Sheridan Cook
Lloyd McKenzie
Paul Knapp
Russ Buchanan
Abdullah Khan
Harsh Sharma
Kunj Joshi
Shamhad Abdi
Maria Hu

Discussion

• Group discussed the way(s) ‘Must Support’ needs to be defined in the Canadian Core; need to have clear expectations
• Sheridan walked the group through her chart which proposes 4 main configurations, each of which deal with 2 scenarios: Query & Create/Update
• Client = requester, server = responder
• Good amount of back and forth re: sending a data element with no value (as opposed to just not using that element at all)
• Some reviewers feel it would be odd to have a 1..1 cardinality and not also have a must support flag
• Topic raised of eliminating the data absent reason extension; relevant discussion are being had in other groups like HL7 Conformance Group, will want to ensure the efforts between these groups are consistent
• Hoping the approach of not using ‘data absent reason’ sees international adoption
• Should add some wording on dealing with modifier elements when an element is must support + 1..1, i.e. does the requester have to consume a modifier element no matter what because it fundamentally impacts the interpretation of the information coming back
• The focus of the must support flag in the query scenario is really the server; we shouldn’t set expectations on that the receiving client had to do with the data it receives
• Current Version of the Must Support Definitions, configurations, and scenarios can be found here: infocentral.infoway-inforoute.ca/en/resources/docs/hl7/canadian-core-profiles

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • Posts: 453
4 years 9 months ago #5648 by Michael Savage
Hi all,

For tomorrow's Canadian Core Governance Call hosted by the Solution Architecture stream, the purpose of the call will be to review a Must-Support Matrix that Sheridan has put together, which defines the various scenarios in which the Must Support flag may apply, and how the use of the flag may change in those different scenarios. The objective will be to work through these various scenarios in an attempt to come to an agreement on how the Canadian Core defines Must Support in these cases.

Thank you!

-Mike

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

InfoCentral logo

Improving the quality of patient care through the effective sharing of clinical information among health care organizations, clinicians and their patients.