Share Your Thoughts on our Terminology Server! Let us know your insights and help enhance our services. The survey is open from Nov 19 to Dec 3, 2024. Your feedback matters!
Learn More >
• Igor Sirkovich
• Sheridan Cook
• Maria Hu
• Alex Goel
• Derek Ritz
• Scott Prior
• Shamil Nizamov
• Smita Kachroo
• Abdullah Khan
• Shamhad Abdi
• Michael Savage
Discussion
• Discussion on definition & usage of Must Support flag for Canadian core profiles
• Existing rule is that any profile derived from the Canadian Core profiles must inherit the Must Support flags as designated
• Strong definition candidate as proposed on FHIR Chat: Must Support = must be capable of incorporating, capturing, and storing the flagged element
• “if you get it, store it. If you have it, send it”
• For next meeting, will have a table of definitions that will help separate the different concepts and clarify each one; can be used to re-organize the content for Must Support for the Canadian Core Profiles
For this Friday's Solution Architecture / Canadian Core Governance Call, the draft agenda is as follows:
1. Discussion of the Canadian Core definition of 'must support'
2. Discussion of the Canadian Core usage of 'data absent reason' elements/functions
3. Updates on shorter duration of bi-weekly Profile Updates & Governance calls
Improving the quality of patient care through the effective sharing of clinical information among health care organizations, clinicians and their patients.