The Canadian Clinical Drug Data Set April 2025 release is now available for access and implementation on the Terminology Server and Terminology Gateway. Learn More >

Important Update: We are pleased to announce significant enhancements to our FHIR Terminology Server, offering more seamless and standards-based access to terminology content for healthcare data exchange. Discover the new features and upcoming changes to our Terminology Gateway. Learn More >

Share this page:

file SI – Inactivation impact of initial and follow-up assessments

  • Posts: 35
2 weeks 15 hours ago #10300 by Julie Boutin
Hello,

The SNOMED International Content team is seeking feedback on the potential impact of inactivating initial and follow-up procedures.

Labelling an assessment as initial or follow-up may prove valuable in scheduling a clinician's time; however, the meaning itself is ambiguous. Is the assessment initial relative to the patient, for each specific condition a patient has, for the physician, for a healthcare enterprise, etc.?

For more details and to see the list of concepts in scope for this update, please see the attached briefing note .

Please provide use cases, if any, that may prove sufficient to maintain a distinction between initial/first and subsequent/follow-up assessments in contrast to using an assessment concept that is not qualified with these terms.

If no sufficient use cases are provided for these concepts, the concepts will be inactivated with a target to an assessment concept that is not qualified with these terms.

Use cases and feedback can be provided via this forum before April 25.

Thank you,

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

InfoCentral logo

Improving the quality of patient care through the effective sharing of clinical information among health care organizations, clinicians and their patients.