Vous pouvez maintenant accéder à la version de decembre 2024 du Répertoire canadien des médicaments à partir de Terminology Gateway et du serveur terminologique, à des fins de consultation ou d’implantation.
En savoir plus >
Thank you for the response! The main reason for the ask is to let the respective WGs know of existing production systems using particular resources to help advancing the maturity level of these resources in the next release(s) of FHIR. We also received advice from Lloyd via chat.fhir.org that "The general advice is to contact the WG by emailing co-chairs, emailing their list or contacting them here and providing the relevant information. They can then add that information to the QA tracking spreadsheet we use for resources."
I am not sure that we have a formally documented process per se, but all you need to do is ask for our help via the Cette adresse courriel est protégée contre les robots spammeurs. Vous devez activer le JavaScript pour la visualiser. account and we will definitely follow up with you.
I think we can certainly help to promote your great work in a number of ways.
You are always welcome to post to the forum and I recommend this for sure, but we are happy to work with you to do a webinar, add an article to Dispatch, work with you to leverage our outreach via social media if applicable, and of course, we are always looking for blog materials.
What is the process for the implementers (e.g. eHealth Ontario) to inform HL7 working groups of the FHIR resource use in our production systems? We'd like to help advancing the maturity level of the FHIR resources as Ontario's EHR continues to evolve with the use of FHIR. Is there any documentation describing the process that can be shared?