Public Health Surveillance

Hi all, We are pleased to provide an update on the Terminology Server since its launch in July 2024. Significant progress has been made to enhance user experience through live drop-in sessions, expanded training resources, and functionality improvements, ensuring a smooth transition from the Terminology Gateway to the new Terminology Server. Highlights Include: We are working closely with our vendors to improve the user interface, simplify access, and better support the download of Terminology artifacts in preferred formats such as pCLOCD (Excel), SNOMED CT (RF2), Value Sets (Excel), and CCDD (Zip package). Updated ... and ... on the ... to help you maximize the server’s features. Most content hosted on the Terminology Gateway (e.g., SNOMED CT CA, pCLOCD, CCDD, and Subsets) will be decommissioned by March 2025, with PrescribeIT® users unaffected for now and continuing to use the Terminology Gateway as usual. Your Feedback Matters: We invite you to participate in our ..., open from November 19 to December 3rd, 2024. This brief survey (3-5 minutes) will directly inform future improvements to our services. For full details on these updates, please visit the .... If you have any questions or further feedback, feel free to contact us through our .... Thank you for your continued collaboration as we work to enhance the Terminology Server together. Best regards,

Please find the ... . Thank you,

Here is the ... for November 7, 2024, 2:00 - 3:00 ET. You can find the ... to register for the call here or in the agenda. Please let me know if you need any additional information. Myriam

Thank you for your comments Etran!

Hi Myriam, From the NVC perspective, our priority is the development of Patient-Friendly Picklists. Regarding subset merging, we can merge the subsets within the NVC using the current structure and mark agents as either active or passive based on their subset membership. If the merging is handled on Infoway’s end, will we still be able to distinguish between active and passive agents, or is there a risk of losing this categorization? If this distinction cannot be preserved, we would prefer Infoway to maintain the subsets separately. Since our current approach meets our needs, we would prioritize this task at the bottom.