- Forum
- Working Groups
- FHIR® Implementations
- CA Baseline Profiles - Profiling Updates - Fri Aug 11th 2-3pm EST Agenda
CA Baseline Profiles - Profiling Updates - Fri Aug 11th 2-3pm EST Agenda
- Lorraine Constable
- Hors Ligne
- Messages : 11
il y a 1 an 3 mois #8622
par Lorraine Constable
Réponse de Lorraine Constable sur le sujet CA Baseline Profiles - Profiling Updates - Fri Aug 11th 2-3pm EST Agenda
Sheridan,
Agree, the bigger picture items are scheduled for the 18th. This is more of a specific technical question, and I have entered the issue here. Will definitely keep it to less than 15 minutes. We have some deadlines around implementing NamingSystems for new implementations into the fall, hence the urgency of the question.
Lorraine.
Agree, the bigger picture items are scheduled for the 18th. This is more of a specific technical question, and I have entered the issue here. Will definitely keep it to less than 15 minutes. We have some deadlines around implementing NamingSystems for new implementations into the fall, hence the urgency of the question.
Lorraine.
Connexion ou Créer un compte pour participer à la conversation.
- Sheridan Cook
- Hors Ligne
- Messages : 68
il y a 1 an 3 mois #8621
par Sheridan Cook
Réponse de Sheridan Cook sur le sujet CA Baseline Profiles - Profiling Updates - Fri Aug 11th 2-3pm EST Agenda
I had logged the discussion around whether we include guidance about our use of the Canadian URI Registry as an item on the governance agenda for 8/18 (following the review of interoperability governance content) since it came up related to guide content creation - but Lorraine if you think we could get an answer more easily through the technical lens we could bump it into today's agenda - please add a ticket to the issue log with context and indicating what you'd like the note to say.
Just a reminder that we did say we'd keep it to 15 minutes to see if we could come to a resolution about whether the guidance discussed was in the scope of the CA Baseline.
Just a reminder that we did say we'd keep it to 15 minutes to see if we could come to a resolution about whether the guidance discussed was in the scope of the CA Baseline.
Connexion ou Créer un compte pour participer à la conversation.
- Mukesh Kashyap
- Hors Ligne
- Messages : 22
il y a 1 an 3 mois #8620
par Mukesh Kashyap
Réponse de Mukesh Kashyap sur le sujet CA Baseline Profiles - Profiling Updates - Fri Aug 11th 2-3pm EST Agenda
Hi Michael,
I will appreciate if you could please include the agenda item Lorraine Constable requested to include for August 11, 2023 CA FHIR WG meeting,
Thanks
I will appreciate if you could please include the agenda item Lorraine Constable requested to include for August 11, 2023 CA FHIR WG meeting,
Thanks
Connexion ou Créer un compte pour participer à la conversation.
- Lorraine Constable
- Hors Ligne
- Messages : 11
il y a 1 an 3 mois #8619
par Lorraine Constable
Réponse de Lorraine Constable sur le sujet CA Baseline Profiles - Profiling Updates - Fri Aug 11th 2-3pm EST Agenda
Hi Micheal, can we also add a quick question regarding the simplifier status settings in the URI registry, or so that be left to a different call?
Thanks,
Lorraine
Thanks,
Lorraine
Connexion ou Créer un compte pour participer à la conversation.
- Michael Savage
- Auteur du sujet
- Hors Ligne
- Messages : 453
il y a 1 an 3 mois #8617
par Michael Savage
CA Baseline Profiles - Profiling Updates - Fri Aug 11th 2-3pm EST Agenda a été créé par Michael Savage
Hi all!
The agenda for tomorrow's CA Baseline Profiles Updates call is as follows:
1. Revisiting extensions that were based on R5 but are now housed in an iGuide that is version-independent (e.g. gender harmony); want to make a decision on whether we'll consider extensions that we previously did not include, on the basis of them being version-specific
2. Returning to analysis of Immunization and how we would apply obligations, and discussion on the stance the Baseline should take toward consumer obligations
Thank you!
The agenda for tomorrow's CA Baseline Profiles Updates call is as follows:
1. Revisiting extensions that were based on R5 but are now housed in an iGuide that is version-independent (e.g. gender harmony); want to make a decision on whether we'll consider extensions that we previously did not include, on the basis of them being version-specific
2. Returning to analysis of Immunization and how we would apply obligations, and discussion on the stance the Baseline should take toward consumer obligations
Thank you!
Connexion ou Créer un compte pour participer à la conversation.