Canadian FHIR Baseline Profiles - Due Diligence Review - IPS – April 23rd, 2-3pm EST

Hi Michael and Sheridan,

Please help me add the logo of the Alberta government in the CA baseline pitch deck presentation.

The recommended log is saved with the link below.
Alberta Health logo for the pitch deck of the CA Baseline


Best Regards,
Thomas Zhou

Attendees:

Michael Savage
Sheridan Cook
Angela Narad
Anne Belford
Finnie Flores
Igor Sirkovich
Jason Lin
Joel Francis
Mairead Fitzsimmons
Shamil Nizamov
Thomas Zhou

• Prior to working on DDR, several attendees flagged US / Int’l COVID & vaccine related implementations and guides which may be good material to compare with our Baseline down the road
• build.fhir.org/ig/dvci/vaccine-credential-ig/branches/main/
• This work uses the SMART Health Cards Framework. (smarthealth.cards/#dataminimization)
• The community review site is: confluence.hl7.org/display/PHWG/2021-04-20+Community+review
• The group conducted due diligence review, continuing with the CA Baseline <> IPS comparisons

AllergyIntolerance

• .identifier
o MS flag in CAB and not in IPS
o (Action) Plan to relax flag in CAB

• .clinical & .verification status
o No change, but still worth investigating how to handle modifier flags

• .category
o Flagged as MS in CAB but not in IPS
o (Action) plan to relax in CAB

• .code
o CAB has an invariant attached to .code
o Want to better understand our CAB modelling for the Not Asked / No Allergy slices; want to know if we need to defend our current slicing & terminology binding structure or not
o Worth raising for R5, to have a base approach for modelling no allergy / unknown / not asked, etc.
o (Action) Want to follow up with folks from IPS on how they’re expecting implementers to work with their slicing structure for .code (absent or unknown allergies)

• .reaction.substance (+.coding)
o (Action) Include in questions to IPS team; reason for not including MS flag here, as it isn’t consistent for other .coding profiling decisions elsewhere; is there a reason .coding is not MS here?

Next session, plan to review any findings from the above questions to go off to IPS team

Hi all!

For this Friday's Profiling / Due Diligence Review meeting, we will be continuing with our DDR comparing CA Baseline to IPS FHIR iGuide, and will look at the following profiles:

(quick recap of recent reviews)

AllergyIntolerance
Device

Thanks!