Request for feedback: SNOMED CT Laboratory Findings Use of ‘Reference Range’ for Reporting

I am wondering if it would not be beneficial to qualify 'reference range' as 'normal reference range' because 'Reference Range could be overly ambiguous...
This would allow you to unambiguously specify <within/above/below>'normal reference range', 'therapeutic reference range' and 'toxic reference range'

For example 442766007 Alcohol in blood specimen above reference range (finding) is ambiguous - are we talking 'zero tolerance reference range' or 'intoxication reference range' or 'toxic/lethal' reference range?

Also
SNOMED is not accommodating differentiation/flagging of critical lab values (example critical high/ critical low potassium levels)

...just some thoughts...

Please find the Briefing Notes here.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Sorry, I am unable to access the briefing notes. Marion Long

Hi Rita,
Sometimes the links don't get converted into the emails properly. Did you try to copy/paste this link into your browser?
confluence.ihtsdotools.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=142139858&preview=/142139858/142139859/MF%20Briefing%20-%20SNOMED%20CT%20Laboratory%20Findings.pdf

Sorry - I can't seem to be able to access the briefing notes... I get Page not found....
Please advise

Good morning Linda,
Would it be beneficial to have this shared in the organism group for the clinical experts to see?
Have a wonderful day,
Debbie