SI's plan is to inactivate these concepts because they are ambiguous and they propose to instead create a new concept "history of x" for cases where it is a procedure performed in the past. But there are some exceptions so this may not be the case for your concepts... Do you have any examples of the type of concepts you use that would be inactivated?
Hi,
In this section, our unit uses concepts that will be desactivated. Clients or partners do not have an application that allows post-coordination. If these concepts are created under "history of", we are concerned that the essence may be lost in french translation.
Please feel free to contact me if you need any further information.
Regards,
The SNOMED International Content Team is seeking feedback on the impact of inactivating <<443938003 |Procedure carried out on subject (situation)|.
313195009 |Procedure carried out (situation)|, with synonym |Procedure done|, was inactivated in 2010 and points to the active concept 443938003 |Procedure carried out on subject (situation)|. Precoordination pattern jira.ihtsdotools.org/browse/PCP-224 prohibits new content of this type due to its ambiguity and potential representation of a procedure lifecycle. This briefing note proposes inactivation of legacy content of this type as Nonconformance to editorial policy with inactivation target alternatives of 129125009 |Procedure with explicit context (situation)| and a corresponding concept from the procedure hierarchy.
For more details and to see the list of concepts in scope for this update, please see the attached
briefing note
.
Please provide feedback on the impact of inactivation of <<443938003 |Procedure carried out on subject (situation)| for your organization via this forum before June 27th.
If no sufficient feedback is provided, the concepts will be inactivated as described with a targeted release of 1 September 2025.
Improving the quality of patient care through the effective sharing of clinical information among health care organizations, clinicians and their patients.